TrueNAS SCALE 22.12.1 has been released!

[morganL]

What is the reasoning behind that? I mean, the very reason for hosting containerized applications on a NAS is to have file sharing access while simultaneously mounting the dataset into a container. This is never a problem on CORE and with jails. And NFS is not a substitute for a local mount. The file system semantics are completely different.

Badly behaved Linux Apps can change ZFS files and permissions and overwrite data.... its only an issue if you also want to SMB/NFS access the data from a client as well.

 

[NugentS]

But couldn't badly behaved FreeBSD apps change ZFS files and permissions and overwrite data as well? Or would a freebsd app not dare to behave badly?

 

[WI_Hedgehog]

But couldn't badly behaved FreeBSD apps change ZFS files and permissions and overwrite data as well? Or would a freebsd app not dare to behave badly?

The six apps that are ported to FreeBSD don't do anything interesting (one is "clock," another is "calculator") so there's nothing to worry about.

 

[billbillw]

Fair to say I'm a newb to FreeNAS. After years of running Proxmox with ubuntu containers, I am used to running updates with command line: apt update>apt upgrade or sometimes apt full-upgrade.

With TrueNAS Scale, I'm seeing this update available. It has download updates, install pending update and Manual Install Update File as options.

What is the preferred method of installing this update? I'm leaning to the install pending update. Let me know if that is incorrect or less preferred.

 

[danb35]

What is the preferred method of installing this update?

Through the GUI--"Install pending update."

 

[billbillw]

Fair to say I'm a newb to FreeNAS. After years of running Proxmox with ubuntu containers, I am used to running updates with command line: apt update>apt upgrade or sometimes apt full-upgrade.

With TrueNAS Scale, I'm seeing this update available. It has download updates, install pending update and Manual Install Update File as options.

What is the preferred method of installing this update? I'm leaning to the install pending update. Let me know if that is incorrect or less preferred.

Update installed. No issues to report. It was painless.

 

[mistermanko]

But couldn't badly behaved FreeBSD apps change ZFS files and permissions and overwrite data as well? Or would a freebsd app not dare to behave badly?

@Kris Moore has explained on reddit some time ago, that this was always the case on CORE/FreeNAS. Why it is suddenly a big deal he didn't, sadly.

 

[morganL]

@Kris Moore has explained on reddit some time ago, that this was always the case on CORE/FreeNAS. Why it is suddenly a big deal he didn't, sadly.

There are several major differences:
1. We are trying to make Apps more suitable for businesses/Enterprises than Plugins
2. There are way more Linux Apps and we don't which ones might be poorly behaved - accidentally or deliberately

That being said, we are reviewing the policy.... will communicate more when we reach a conclusion.

 

[tprelog]

Smooth update from 22.12.0 -> 22.12.1

I've only noticed one small regression with virtual macines... That is when stopping a VM - This pop-up just hangs here with a message Fetching data..., even after the VM has successfully stopped. In previous versions, this box would update with a message and an OK button after the VM shutdown.

 

[morganL]

Smooth update from 22.12.0 -> 22.12.1

I've only noticed one small regression with virtual macines... That is when stopping a VM - This pop-up just hangs here with a message Fetching data..., even after the VM has successfully stopped. In previous versions, this box would update with a message and an OK button after the VM shutdown.


View attachment 63948

Please Report a Bug.

 

[JohnnyD]

Upgraded main and backup machines here with no issues from 22.12.0

 

[vm_boy]

I upgraded to 22.12.1 and then had a boot issue involving the kernel init something or other. I started a thread in Hardware/Upgrades but I'm not sure if that is the right spot: https://www.truenas.com/community/t...nic-not-syncing-no-working-init-found.108252/

 

[sybreeder]

Will new version work well with Active Directory ? Previous don't work properly.

 

[NugentS]

Seems to work just fine. The workarounds that I was using do not seem to be required any longer

 

[sybreeder]

Seems to work just fine. The workarounds that I was using do not seem to be required any longer

What workarounds have you been using?

 

[NugentS]

I was running

Code:

midclt call dscache.refresh -job

every few hours as a cron job

 

[opensourcefan]

Updated last night, it hung on extracting at 50% for about an hour then jumped to 90% post install tasks and hung there for a good while. Upon first reboot no apps would start. Deleted the token and rebooted, Storj started but Photoprism still hasn't gone active, stuck on deploying.

First update I've had issues with, a little concerned now as I don't want to disrupt my Storj experiment with down time.

Baremetal install on a R730

 

[morganL]

Updated last night, it hung on extracting at 50% for about an hour then jumped to 90% post install tasks and hung there for a good while. Upon first reboot no apps would start. Deleted the token and rebooted, Storj started but Photoprism still hasn't gone active, stuck on deploying.

First update I've had issues with, a little concerned now as I don't want to disrupt my Storj experiment with down time.

Baremetal install on a R730

Let us know if it persists... can you check that Internet connectivity is solid to Github etc.

 

[opensourcefan]

Let us know if it persists... can you check that Internet connectivity is solid to Github etc.

The issue with Photoprism for whatever reason was due to an SMB share being active on it's mnt directories. I temporarily disabled the SMB share, and cycled the container and it started immediately. Turned the share back on and all is well.

Curious what happened?

 

[danb35]

Curious what happened?

Search for "host path validation"; I'd expect there are over a dozen threads on this by now.